PEP 3144 – IP Address Manipulation Library for the Python Standard Library
- PEP
- 3144
- Title
- IP Address Manipulation Library for the Python Standard Library
- Author
- Peter Moody <pmoody at google.com>
- BDFL-Delegate
- Nick Coghlan
- Discussions-To
- <ipaddr-py-dev at googlegroups.com>
- Status
- Final
- Type
- Standards Track
- Created
- 06-Feb-2012
- Python-Version
- 3.3
- Resolution
- https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-May/119474.html
Contents
Abstract
This PEP proposes a design and for an IP address manipulation module for python.
PEP Acceptance
This PEP was accepted by Nick Coghlan on the 15th of May, 2012.
Motivation
Several very good IP address modules for python already exist.
The truth is that all of them struggle with the balance between
adherence to Pythonic principals and the shorthand upon which
network engineers and administrators rely. ipaddress
aims to
strike the right balance.
Rationale
The existence of several Python IP address manipulation modules is evidence of an outstanding need for the functionality this module seeks to provide.
Background
PEP 3144 and ipaddr
have been up for inclusion before. The
version of the library specified here is backwards incompatible
with the version on PyPI and the one which was discussed before.
In order to avoid confusing users of the current ipaddr
, I’ve
renamed this version of the library ipaddress
.
The main differences between ipaddr and ipaddress are:
ipaddress
*Network classes are equivalent to theipaddr
*Network class counterparts with thestrict
flag set toTrue
.ipaddress
*Interface classes are equivalent to theipaddr
*Network class counterparts with thestrict
flag set toFalse
.- The factory functions in
ipaddress
were renamed to disambiguate them from classes. - A few attributes were renamed to disambiguate their purpose as
well. (eg.
network
,network_address
) - A number of methods and functions which returned containers in
ipaddr
now return iterators. This includessubnets
,address_exclude
,summarize_address_range
andcollapse_address_list
.
Due to the backwards incompatible API changes between ipaddress
and ipaddr
,
the proposal is to add the module using the new provisional API status:
Relevant messages on python-dev:
Specification
The ipaddr
module defines a total of 6 new public classes, 3 for
manipulating IPv4 objects and 3 for manipulating IPv6 objects.
The classes are as follows:
IPv4Address
/IPv6Address
- These define individual addresses, for example the IPv4 address returned by an A record query for www.google.com (74.125.224.84) or the IPv6 address returned by a AAAA record query for ipv6.google.com (2001:4860:4001:801::1011).IPv4Network
/IPv6Network
- These define networks or groups of addresses, for example the IPv4 network reserved for multicast use (224.0.0.0/4) or the IPv6 network reserved for multicast (ff00::/8, wow, that’s big).IPv4Interface
/IPv6Interface
- These hybrid classes refer to an individual address on a given network. For example, the IPV4 address 192.0.2.1 on the network 192.0.2.0/24 could be referred to as 192.0.2.1/24. Likewise, the IPv6 address 2001:DB8::1 on the network 2001:DB8::/96 could be referred to as 2001:DB8::1/96. It’s very common to refer to addresses assigned to computer network interfaces like this, hence the Interface name.
All IPv4 classes share certain characteristics and methods; the number of bits needed to represent them, whether or not they belong to certain special IPv4 network ranges, etc. Similarly, all IPv6 classes share characteristics and methods.
ipaddr
makes extensive use of inheritance to avoid code
duplication as much as possible. The parent classes are private,
but they are outlined here:
_IPAddrBase
- Provides methods common to allipaddr
objects._BaseAddress
- Provides methods common toIPv4Address
andIPv6Address
._BaseInterface
- Provides methods common toIPv4Interface
andIPv6Interface
, as well asIPv4Network
andIPv6Network
(ipaddr
treats the Network classes as a special case of Interface)._BaseV4
- Provides methods and variables (eg,_max_prefixlen
) common to all IPv4 classes._BaseV6
- Provides methods and variables common to all IPv6 classes.
Comparisons between objects of differing IP versions results in a
TypeError
1. Additionally, comparisons of objects with
different _Base parent classes results in a TypeError
. The effect
of the _Base parent class limitation is that IPv4Interface
’s can
be compared to IPv4Network
’s and IPv6Interface
’s can be compared
to IPv6Network
’s.
Reference Implementation
The current reference implementation can be found at:
http://code.google.com/p/ipaddress-py/source/browse/ipaddress.py
Or see the tarball to include the README and unittests. http://code.google.com/p/ipaddress-py/downloads/detail?name=ipaddress-1.0.tar.gz
More information about using the reference implementation can be found at: http://code.google.com/p/ipaddr-py/wiki/Using3144
References
- 1
- Appealing to authority is a logical fallacy, but Vint Cerf is an
authority who can’t be ignored. Full text of the email
follows:I have seen a substantial amount of traffic about IPv4 and IPv6 comparisons and the general consensus is that these are not comparable.
If we were to take a very simple minded view, we might treat these as pure integers in which case there is an ordering but not a useful one.
In the IPv4 world, “length” is important because we take longest (most specific) address first for routing. Length is determine by the mask, as you know.
Assuming that the same style of argument works in IPv6, we would have to conclude that treating an IPv6 value purely as an integer for comparison with IPv4 would lead to some really strange results.
All of IPv4 space would lie in the host space of 0::0/96 prefix of IPv6. For any useful interpretation of IPv4, this is a non-starter.
I think the only sensible conclusion is that IPv4 values and IPv6 values should be treated as non-comparable.
Vint
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-3144.txt
Last modified: 2021-02-09 16:54:26 GMT