PEP 667 – Consistent views of namespaces
- PEP
- 667
- Title
- Consistent views of namespaces
- Author
- Mark Shannon <mark at hotpy.org>
- Status
- Draft
- Type
- Standards Track
- Created
- 30-Jul-2021
- Post-History
- 20-Aug-2021
Contents
Abstract
In early versions of Python all namespaces, whether in functions, classes or modules, were all implemented the same way: as a dictionary.
For performance reasons, the implementation of function namespaces was
changed. Unfortunately this meant that accessing these namespaces through
locals()
and frame.f_locals
ceased to be consistent and some
odd bugs crept in over the years as threads, generators and coroutines
were added.
This PEP proposes making these namespaces consistent once more.
Modifications to frame.f_locals
will always be visible in
the underlying variables. Modifications to local variables will
immediately be visible in frame.f_locals
, and they will be
consistent regardless of threading or coroutines.
The locals()
function will act the same as it does now for class
and modules scopes. For function scopes it will return an instantaneous
snapshot of the underlying frame.f_locals
.
Motivation
The current implementation of locals()
and frame.f_locals
is slow,
inconsistent and buggy.
We want to make it faster, consistent, and most importantly fix the bugs.
For example:
class C:
x = 1
sys._getframe().f_locals['x'] = 2
print(x)
prints 2
but:
def f():
x = 1
sys._getframe().f_locals['x'] = 2
print(x)
f()
prints 1
This is inconsistent, and confusing.
With this PEP both examples would print 2
.
Worse than that, the current behavior can result in strange bugs 1
There are no compensating advantages for the current behavior; it is unreliable and slow.
Rationale
The current implementation of frame.f_locals
returns a dictionary
that is created on the fly from the array of local variables.
This can result in the array and dictionary getting out of sync with
each other. Writes to the f_locals
may not show up as
modifications to local variables. Writes to local variables can get lost.
By making frame.f_locals
return a view on the
underlying frame, these problems go away. frame.f_locals
is always in
sync with the frame because it is a view of it, not a copy of it.
Specification
Python
frame.f_locals
will return a view object on the frame that
implements the collections.abc.Mapping
interface.
For module and class scopes frame.f_locals
will be a dictionary,
for function scopes it will be a custom class.
locals()
will be defined as:
def locals():
frame = sys._getframe(1)
f_locals = frame.f_locals
if frame.is_function():
f_locals = dict(f_locals)
return f_locals
All writes to the f_locals
mapping will be immediately visible
in the underlying variables. All changes to the underlying variables
will be immediately visible in the mapping. The f_locals
object will
be a full mapping, and can have arbitrary key-value pairs added to it.
For example:
def l():
"Get the locals of caller"
return sys._getframe(1).f_locals
def test():
if 0: y = 1 # Make 'y' a local variable
x = 1
l()['x'] = 2
l()['y'] = 4
l()['z'] = 5
y
print(locals(), x)
test()
will print {'x': 2, 'y': 4, 'z': 5} 2
In Python 3.10, the above will fail with a NameError
,
as the definition of y
by l()['y'] = 4
is lost.
C-API
Extensions to the API
Two new C-API functions will be added:
PyObject *PyEval_Locals(void)
PyObject *PyFrame_GetLocals(PyFrameObject *f)
PyEval_Locals()
is equivalent to: locals()
.
PyFrame_GetLocals(f)
is equivalent to: f.f_locals
.
Both functions will return a new reference.
Changes to existing APIs
The C-API function PyEval_GetLocals()
will be deprecated.
PyEval_Locals()
should be used instead.
The following three functions will become no-ops, and will be deprecated:
PyFrame_FastToLocalsWithError()
PyFrame_FastToLocals()
PyFrame_LocalsToFast()
The above four deprecated functions will be removed in 3.13.
Behavior of f_locals for optimized functions
Although f.f_locals
behaves as if it were the namespace of the function,
there will be some observable differences.
For example, f.f_locals is f.f_locals
may be False
.
However f.f_locals == f.f_locals
will be True
, and
all changes to the underlying variables, by any means, will be
always be visible.
Backwards Compatibility
Python
The current implementation has many corner cases and oddities.
Code that works around those may need to be changed.
Code that uses locals()
for simple templating, or print debugging,
will continue to work correctly. Debuggers and other tools that use
f_locals
to modify local variables, will now work correctly,
even in the presence of threaded code, coroutines and generators.
C-API
PyEval_GetLocals
Because PyEval_GetLocals()
returns a borrowed reference, it requires
the dictionary to be cached on the frame, extending its lifetime and
forces memory to be allocated for the frame object on the heap as well.
Using PyEval_Locals()
will be much more efficient
than PyEval_GetLocals()
.
This code:
locals = PyEval_GetLocals();
if (locals == NULL) {
goto error_handler;
}
Py_INCREF(locals);
should be replaced with:
locals = PyEval_Locals();
if (locals == NULL) {
goto error_handler;
}
PyFrame_FastToLocals, etc.
These functions were designed to convert the internal “fast” representation of the locals variables of a function to a dictionary, and vice versa.
Calls to them are no longer required. C code that directly accesses the
f_locals
field of a frame should be modified to call
PyFrame_GetLocals()
instead:
PyFrame_FastToLocals(frame);
PyObject *locals = frame.f_locals;
Py_INCREF(locals);
becomes:
PyObject *locals = PyFrame_GetLocals(frame);
if (frame == NULL)
goto error_handler;
Implementation
Each read of frame.f_locals
will create a new proxy object that gives
the appearance of being the mapping of local (including cell and free)
variable names to the values of those local variables.
A possible implementation is sketched out below. All attributes that start with an underscore are invisible and cannot be accessed directly. They serve only to illustrate the proposed design.
NULL: Object # NULL is a singleton representing the absence of a value.
class CodeType:
_name_to_offset_mapping_impl: dict | NULL
_cells: frozenset # Set of indexes of cell and free variables
...
def __init__(self, ...):
self._name_to_offset_mapping_impl = NULL
self._variable_names = deduplicate(
self.co_varnames + self.co_cellvars + self.co_freevars
)
...
@property
def _name_to_offset_mapping(self):
"Mapping of names to offsets in local variable array."
if self._name_to_offset_mapping_impl is NULL:
self._name_to_offset_mapping_impl = {
name: index for (index, name) in enumerate(self._variable_names)
}
return self._name_to_offset_mapping_impl
class FrameType:
_locals : array[Object] # The values of the local variables, items may be NULL.
_extra_locals: dict | NULL # Dictionary for storing extra locals not in _locals.
def __init__(self, ...):
self._extra_locals = NULL
...
@property
def f_locals(self):
return FrameLocalsProxy(self)
class FrameLocalsProxy:
__slots__ "_frame"
def __init__(self, frame:FrameType):
self._frame = frame
def __getitem__(self, name):
f = self._frame
co = f.f_code
if name in co._name_to_offset_mapping:
index = co._name_to_offset_mapping[name]
val = f._locals[index]
if val is NULL:
raise KeyError(name)
if index in co._cells
val = val.cell_contents
if val is NULL:
raise KeyError(name)
return val
else:
if f._extra_locals is NULL:
raise KeyError(name)
return f._extra_locals[name]
def __setitem__(self, name, value):
f = self._frame
co = f.f_code
if name in co._name_to_offset_mapping:
index = co._name_to_offset_mapping[name]
kind = co._local_kinds[index]
if index in co._cells
cell = f._locals[index]
cell.cell_contents = val
else:
f._locals[index] = val
else:
if f._extra_locals is NULL:
f._extra_locals = {}
f._extra_locals[name] = val
def __iter__(self):
f = self._frame
co = f.f_code
yield from iter(f._extra_locals)
for index, name in enumerate(co._variable_names):
val = f._locals[index]
if val is NULL:
continue
if index in co._cells:
val = val.cell_contents
if val is NULL:
continue
yield name
def pop(self):
f = self._frame
co = f.f_code
if f._extra_locals:
return f._extra_locals.pop()
for index, _ in enumerate(co._variable_names):
val = f._locals[index]
if val is NULL:
continue
if index in co._cells:
cell = val
val = cell.cell_contents
if val is NULL:
continue
cell.cell_contents = NULL
else:
f._locals[index] = NULL
return val
def __len__(self):
f = self._frame
co = f.f_code
res = 0
for index, _ in enumerate(co._variable_names):
val = f._locals[index]
if val is NULL:
continue
if index in co._cells:
if val.cell_contents is NULL:
continue
res += 1
return len(self._extra_locals) + res
C API
PyEval_GetLocals()
will be implemented roughly as follows:
PyObject *PyEval_GetLocals(void) {
PyFrameObject * = ...; // Get the current frame.
Py_CLEAR(frame->_locals_cache);
frame->_locals_cache = PyEval_Locals();
return frame->_locals_cache;
}
As with all functions that return a borrowed reference, care must be taken to ensure that the reference is not used beyond the lifetime of the object.
Comparison with PEP 558
This PEP and PEP 558 2 share a common goal:
to make the semantics of locals()
and frame.f_locals()
intelligible, and their operation reliable.
In the author’s opinion, PEP 558 fails to do that as it is too complex, and has many corner cases which will lead to bugs.
The key difference between this PEP and PEP 558 is that PEP 558 requires an internal copy of the local variables, whereas this PEP does not. Maintaining a copy adds considerably to the complexity of both the specification and implementation, and brings no real benefits.
The semantics of frame.f_locals
In this PEP, frame.f_locals
is a view onto the underlying frame.
It is always synchronized with the underlying frame.
In PEP 558, there is an additional copy of the local variables present
in the frame which is updated whenever frame.f_locals
is accessed.
PEP 558 does not make it clear whether calls to locals()
update frame.f_locals
or not.
For example consider:
def foo():
x = sys._getframe().f_locals
y = locals()
print(tuple(x))
print(tuple(y))
It is not clear from PEP 558 (at time of writing) what would be printed.
Does the call to locals()
update x
?
Would "y"
be present in either x
or y
?
With this PEP it should be clear that the above would print:
('x', 'y')
('x',)
Open Issues
An alternative way to define locals()
would be simply as:
def locals():
return sys._getframe(1).f_locals
This would be simpler and easier to understand. However,
there would be backwards compatibility issues when locals
is assigned
to a local variable or when passed to eval
or exec
.
References
- 1
- https://bugs.python.org/issue30744
- 2
- https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0558/
Copyright
This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal license, whichever is more permissive.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0667.rst
Last modified: 2021-08-25 15:27:10 GMT