Python Enhancement Proposals

PEP 243 – Module Repository Upload Mechanism

PEP
243
Title
Module Repository Upload Mechanism
Author
jafo-pep at tummy.com (Sean Reifschneider)
Discussions-To
distutils-sig at python.org
Status
Withdrawn
Type
Standards Track
Created
18-Mar-2001
Python-Version
2.1
Post-History
20-Mar-2001, 24-Mar-2001

Contents

Abstract

For a module repository system (such as Perl’s CPAN) to be successful, it must be as easy as possible for module authors to submit their work. An obvious place for this submit to happen is in the Distutils tools after the distribution archive has been successfully created. For example, after a module author has tested their software (verifying the results of setup.py sdist), they might type setup.py sdist --submit. This would flag Distutils to submit the source distribution to the archive server for inclusion and distribution to the mirrors.

This PEP only deals with the mechanism for submitting the software distributions to the archive, and does not deal with the actual archive/catalog server.

Upload Process

The upload will include the Distutils PKG-INFO meta-data information (as specified in PEP 241 1), the actual software distribution, and other optional information. This information will be uploaded as a multi-part form encoded the same as a regular HTML file upload request. This form is posted using ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data" encoding 2.

The upload will be made to the host “www.python.org” on port 80/tcp (POST http://www.python.org:80/pypi). The form will consist of the following fields:

  • distribution – The file containing the module software (for example, a .tar.gz or .zip file).
  • distmd5sum – The MD5 hash of the uploaded distribution, encoded in ASCII representing the hexadecimal representation of the digest (for byte in digest: s = s + ('%02x' % ord(byte))).
  • pkginfo (optional) – The file containing the distribution meta-data (as specified in PEP 241 1). Note that if this is not included, the distribution file is expected to be in .tar format (gzipped and bzipped compressed are allowed) or .zip format, with a PKG-INFO file in the top-level directory it extracts (package-1.00/PKG-INFO).
  • infomd5sum (required if pkginfo field is present) – The MD5 hash of the uploaded meta-data, encoded in ASCII representing the hexadecimal representation of the digest (for byte in digest: s = s + ('%02x' % ord(byte))).
  • platform (optional) – A string representing the target platform for this distribution. This is only for binary distributions. It is encoded as <os_name>-<os_version>-<platform architecture>-<python version>.
  • signature (optional) – A OpenPGP-compatible signature 3 of the uploaded distribution as signed by the author. This may be used by the cataloging system to automate acceptance of uploads.
  • protocol_version – A string indicating the protocol version that the client supports. This document describes protocol version “1”.

Return Data

The status of the upload will be reported using HTTP non-standard (X-*) headers. The X-Swalow-Status header may have the following values:

  • SUCCESS – Indicates that the upload has succeeded.
  • FAILURE – The upload is, for some reason, unable to be processed.
  • TRYAGAIN – The server is unable to accept the upload at this time, but the client should try again at a later time. Potential causes of this are resource shortages on the server, administrative down-time, etc…

Optionally, there may be a X-Swalow-Reason header which includes a human-readable string which provides more detailed information about the X-Swalow-Status.

If there is no X-Swalow-Status header, or it does not contain one of the three strings above, it should be treated as a temporary failure.

Example:

>>> f = urllib.urlopen('http://www.python.org:80/pypi')
>>> s = f.headers['x-swalow-status']
>>> s = s + ': ' + f.headers.get('x-swalow-reason', '<None>')
>>> print s
FAILURE: Required field "distribution" missing.

Sample Form

The upload client must submit the page in the same form as Netscape Navigator version 4.76 for Linux produces when presented with the following form:

<H1>Upload file</H1>
<FORM NAME="fileupload" METHOD="POST" ACTION="pypi"
    ENCTYPE="multipart/form-data">
<INPUT TYPE="file" NAME="distribution"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="distmd5sum"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="file" NAME="pkginfo"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="infomd5sum"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="platform"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="signature"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="protocol_version" VALUE="1"><BR>
<INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" VALUE="Upload">
</FORM>

Platforms

The following are valid os names:

aix beos debian dos freebsd hpux mac macos mandrake netbsd
openbsd qnx redhat solaris suse windows yellowdog

The above include a number of different types of distributions of Linux. Because of versioning issues these must be split out, and it is expected that when it makes sense for one system to use distributions made on other similar systems, the download client will make the distinction.

Version is the official version string specified by the vendor for the particular release. For example, “2000” and “nt” (Windows), “9.04” (HP-UX), “7.0” (RedHat, Mandrake).

The following are valid architectures:

alpha hppa ix86 powerpc sparc ultrasparc

Status

I currently have a proof-of-concept client and server implemented. I plan to have the Distutils patches ready for the 2.1 release. Combined with Andrew’s PEP 241 1 for specifying distribution meta-data, I hope to have a platform which will allow us to gather real-world data for finalizing the catalog system for the 2.2 release.

References

1 (1, 2, 3)
Metadata for Python Software Package, Kuchling, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0241/
2
RFC 1867, Form-based File Upload in HTML http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1867.html
3
RFC 2440, OpenPGP Message Format http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2440.html

Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0243.txt

Last modified: 2019-06-25 04:58:50 GMT